蒙城华人网

标题: 我今天的上庭经历 [打印本页]

作者: 春江花月夜    时间: 2006-4-19 17:16
标题: 我今天的上庭经历
去年6月的时候我曾经贴过一个帖子,大意是因为有辆警车在马路当中以很低的速度开在马路当中,也没有开警灯啊什么的,我跟了一会因为不耐烦晔不知道她们干什么就按了一下喇叭从右侧超车;2个女警觉得我挑战了她们在马路上的特权,让我停车接受检查。因为想找我碴但又没有借口,最后说我车辆登记证上没有签字而给了我95元的罚单。

我当时很不服,因为我认为是警察滥用权力,而且还声称我要继续和她们“argue"的话可以给我多到1000元的罚单。从那天起我就决定要和她们上法庭,当时有朋友声援,也有朋友人认为我必输,建议我交钱了事。

事隔差不多一年,今天终于有了在加拿大第一次上庭的经验。我向法官称述了当天事发的经过,强调第一我question她们给我罚单的动机;第二我认为她们在路上不应有特权;第三我责问她们的态度和对我的威胁。法官最后说,完全理解我的感受,并且完全相信我所陈述的事实;但因为我确实没有签车辆登记的小绿条,所以罚款要交,但减到了70,并且免去我所有可能要交的其他费用,还另外给60天交钱。他问代表警察出庭的律师(或公诉人有没有意见),那人表示完全没有意见。最后我向他们指出,我认罚我该交的部分,但这是一个典型的警察滥用权力的例子。他们表示理解。

单从今天上庭的经历来看,我认为我赢了。我想借我的经历给大家提个醒:
1. 不要害怕上庭,司法程序是我们在这里生活的一部分;
2. 要保持证据;当时事发后我就写了一个plea,在我得电脑里,上庭前2天自己打印了出来,所以对当天的事情很清楚;
3. 不要对当地的警察有过高的期望,我相信他们中的部分素质远不如技术移民过来的受过良好教育的人们,所以不用和他们argue或试图和他们讲道理(当时我对2位女警没有客气,直接告诉她们你们不要以为你们有特权,咱们庭上见!),反而应该注意保留证据;我想我当天要是用录音(比如MP3或者我得手机录下她们威胁我要给我罚单上至1000元因为我challenge了她们的话),这件事我就不会这么简单了。

鼓励大家拿起武器捍卫我们自己的权力。
作者: txm    时间: 2006-4-19 17:40
顶一下,不过她们滥用职权,不知道法官对她们有没有警告或惩罚
作者: 我本无心    时间: 2006-4-20 07:21
好样的!!!
作者: CnFr    时间: 2006-4-20 15:37
是一个典型的警察滥用权力的例子吗?那对2位警察做出了什么处罚?
作者: big_hard    时间: 2006-4-20 17:19
好样的,支持
作者: mfeous    时间: 2006-4-20 20:30
pls see my comment in the attachment

my comment.doc

0 Bytes, 下载次数: 77


作者: kinscard    时间: 2006-4-21 08:07
坚决支持楼主的行动!真正是条汉子!:cool:
作者: mfeous    时间: 2006-4-21 09:24
i remember your story and it is good for you to save $25. but your victory stops here. then it comes up a question: do all your efforts justify the cause? apparently no, you still have to pay $70, plus the  time and troubls you spent in the court. obviously you don't care about the money, time and troubls only "justice". however, do you really have a persuasive argument? it seems to me, no.

if i were the police officer, i would give you another ticket right on the spot for second account-intimidating the other driver by honking the horn. here is my reasoning:

suppose the car before you is a normal car, not a police car, you should not honk your horn even he/she drives only 10 km/h, because there is no minimum speed limit in the city. actually, you have two options: either passing or following the car in front you.

why not give some benefits of doubts to the police? besides, they were on duty. also keep it in mind: police does have privilege on the road, no matter you like it or not.

i sympathize you, so did the judge. but it did not prove that the police did anything wrong when the judge took $25 of your $95 fine.

i disagree one of your statement below i changed the font color in red


good education does not always yield  good personal quality.

Post by 春江花月夜
去年6月的时候我曾经贴过一个帖子,大意是因为有辆警车在马路当中以很低的速度开在马路当中,也没有开警灯啊什么的,我跟了一会因为不耐烦晔不知道她们干什么就按了一下喇叭从右侧超车;2个女警觉得我挑战了她们在马路上的特权,让我停车接受检查。因为想找我碴但又没有借口,最后说我车辆登记证上没有签字而给了我95元的罚单。

我当时很不服,因为我认为是警察滥用权力,而且还声称我要继续和她们“argue"的话可以给我多到1000元的罚单。从那天起我就决定要和她们上法庭,当时有朋友声援,也有朋友人认为我必输,建议我交钱了事。

事隔差不多一年,今天终于有了在加拿大第一次上庭的经验。我向法官称述了当天事发的经过,强调第一我question她们给我罚单的动机;第二我认为她们在路上不应有特权;第三我责问她们的态度和对我的威胁。法官最后说,完全理解我的感受,并且完全相信我所陈述的事实;但因为我确实没有签车辆登记的小绿条,所以罚款要交,但减到了70,并且免去我所有可能要交的其他费用,还另外给60天交钱。他问代表警察出庭的律师(或公诉人有没有意见),那人表示完全没有意见。最后我向他们指出,我认罚我该交的部分,但这是一个典型的警察滥用权力的例子。他们表示理解。

单从今天上庭的经历来看,我认为我赢了。我想借我的经历给大家提个醒:
1. 不要害怕上庭,司法程序是我们在这里生活的一部分;
2. 要保持证据;当时事发后我就写了一个plea,在我得电脑里,上庭前2天自己打印了出来,所以对当天的事情很清楚;
3. 不要对当地的警察有过高的期望,我相信他们中的部分素质远不如技术移民过来的受过良好教育的人们,所以不用和他们argue或试图和他们讲道理(当时我对2位女警没有客气,直接告诉她们你们不要以为你们有特权,咱们庭上见!),反而应该注意保留证据;我想我当天要是用录音(比如MP3或者我得手机录下她们威胁我要给我罚单上至1000元因为我challenge了她们的话),这件事我就不会这么简单了。

鼓励大家拿起武器捍卫我们自己的权力。

作者: ufaw0132    时间: 2006-4-24 11:55
為中國人出了口氣,值得大家一起來讚揚!
作者: 春江花月夜    时间: 2006-4-24 17:08
i ALSO disagree one of your statement below i changed the font color in red .
here is my reasons:
one of my friend, a Jew, drove on street where there is some kind construction. He is a very cautious man so he decided to slow down. Unfortunately, there is a police wagon follwoing him and pulled over his car. My friend got a ticket for 155$ and the reason told by the police officer is exactly he drove at a Too Slow Speed. This happened in last month and my friend made a same choice as mine.

Thank you Mfeous for your time and troubles of giving me your comments. Although I do care my money,time and troubles I spent, I still put justice in the primary.  I don't agree pressing a horn means annoying others, instead, as a remind or a warning of passing, this is also why we have horns in our cars. But frankly to you, Mfeous, your logic is not clear since if you think I annoy others by pressing my horn and I am guilty, the police should have given me a ticket of this, not going through all of my documents and then "pick a bone from eggs", in other words, by other excurses.

My ticket of 70$ is for my mistake that I didn't sign my registration paper. This is what I deserve but in the court, I questioned their motivation and my plea is fully supported by the judge. But still, I have no victory in my case at all. If we are talking about victory, I should sue these two junk polices, although this is really what I want to.

Losing 70$,buying a lesson and a experience is much more than your sympathy. And I do agree the police have previllege only in conditiona that they are really on their duties and they are doing their jobs properly. If no, my answer is no,either.

And thanks God Mfeous were not a police. Otherwise there is too much overwhelming work for the court.     
Post by mfeous
i remember your story and it is good for you to save $25. but your victory stops here. then it comes up a question: do all your efforts justify the cause? apparently no, you still have to pay $70, plus the time and troubls you spent in the court. obviously you don't care about the money, time and troubls only "justice". however, do you really have a persuasive argument? it seems to me, no.

if i were the police officer, i would give you another ticket right on the spot for second account-intimidating the other driver by honking the horn. here is my reasoning:

suppose the car before you is a normal car, not a police car, you should not honk your horn even he/she drives only 10 km/h, because there is no minimum speed limit in the city. actually, you have two options: either passing or following the car in front you.

why not give some benefits of doubts to the police? besides, they were on duty. also keep it in mind: police does have privilege on the road, no matter you like it or not.

i sympathize you, so did the judge. but it did not prove that the police did anything wrong when the judge took $25 of your $95 fine.

i disagree one of your statement below i changed the font color in red


good education does not always yield good personal quality.

作者: lollaploza    时间: 2006-4-24 19:19
标题: 求求各位
求求各位,不要再发中国式的英文了,感觉怪怪的:eek!:
作者: big_hard    时间: 2006-4-24 20:32
维护自己的权益不仅仅是为了个人,也是为了整个社会的公正法律环境,有什么好反对的???!!!
作者: wyhzhy    时间: 2006-4-25 01:16
支持楼主!


就算不知道对当事警察是否有处罚也觉得出了口气。希望这样的事即使没有人一定要告他们,也会有一个不良记录跟着。楼主也不必大动干戈,点到为止就行了,跟他们争得太多了就是浪费时间了。

另外,用短按一声喇叭的方法提醒其他的司机是正常的,通常行使在路上,谁都有个溜号或做得不好的时候,比如没注意红灯已经变成绿灯了,还停在那里没有向前行驶,这时不管谁听到一声短滴都会理解(当然有些人按喇叭的态度很恶劣,另当别论)。行驶速度过慢的车辆也应接受别人的提醒。虽然路边没有最低时速的限制,但是前提是不可以堵塞交通。考驾照时你开多少?那是正常行驶的要求。速度太慢考试要扣分,平时要被罚款。我敢担保没有哪个人敢在正常路况下故意保持10km/h的速度不变。打着应急灯可以行使多远?不知道。还望知道的朋友解答。
作者: mfeous    时间: 2006-4-25 21:36
your jewish friend's story can not be confirmed here either true or false, therefore i don't want to comment on it. however, your idea when to honk the horn is definitely misconcepted. under no circumstances should someone honk the horn unless an emergency occurs. otherwise, it is considered rude and impatient.

it is true that in real life people do it anyway in all kinds of situations, yet it doesn't mean they are right and we should follow.  as for your case, two things are critical, first, it's a police car and they were on duty(the siren does not neccessary have to be on), second, it did not cause any traffic problem, you could just pass without making any fuzz. in light of these two facts, your acusation of abusing power by the police is groundless.

remember that the police is entilted to stop you and check your car registration. your strange behavior just made them suspicious to do so.

your determination of protecting your right is admirable, unfortunatly the  motive was wrong. it is very disturbing and destructive for you to used an invalid case to discredit the montreal law enforement, and it was even worst, you called on others to follow your example.
作者: FengFan    时间: 2006-4-26 00:11
车开得慢被罚款是很正常的,已有多个我知道的例子了,有老外也有华人的。楼主的帖子很客观也很积极,支持!!! 我们是忍得多,反击的少,历史与文化的原因吧。

大家多用英语发发帖子也是好事,无论好坏。多练,英语是靠练出来的,毕竟我们生活在这里。如有什么不妥的用法,不妨指出吗,其他人也可能会得到提高地。另外,有些在网吧或学校机房上机的朋友,只能用英文地。应予体谅。
:cool:


作者: blackcoffe    时间: 2006-4-26 02:16
Post by PPV
我就敬佩这样的人。有骨气,头脑冷静。
在说“我爱加拿大”这句屁话之前。问问加拿大爱你吗?

要怎么样才算是爱你?要给你特权吗?要对你低三下四吗?
任何人都有犯错和被冤枉的可能, 但是任何人都有到法庭上辩论的权利和机会, 这难道不就是我们想看到的公平吗?
坏人哪里都有, 坏警察也同样哪里都有。楼主这个案子讨论的是楼主本人是否违规的问题, 如果想要追究那两个警察滥用权力, 应该另行起诉, 相信胜面也会很大的。 这个法庭上的法官和那个律师的看法甚至都可以作为参考。
PPV, 也许你在加拿大的生活很悲惨或者是不太如意,但是不能把其他生活幸福, 非常如意的人所说的赞美的话说成是屁话, 你越这么说, 只能反应出你能力低下而且自卑, 甚至, 眼红嫉妒。久而久之, 没有人说你可怜, 只会说你可恨了。
作者: big_hard    时间: 2006-4-26 14:16
Post by mfeous
your jewish friend's story ......... and even worst, you called on others to follow your example.
您的论述似乎很中肯,但是你没有注意到当时楼主的一句话“如果argue的话,增加罚款”,可以判断警察感情用事了
作者: 春江花月夜    时间: 2006-4-26 17:23
感谢各位朋友的跟贴,不管你是赞同我的做法,还是对此嗤之以鼻。

去年的帖子找不到了,如果有些朋友记得的话,应该记得我当时明确指出,在我前面的警车开在单行道上,这条街有2个道,警车跨着车道,换言之,完全赌塞了交通,而且没有给任何明示比如她们正在执行一项紧急的任务;否则我也不至于去对警车按喇叭,谁比谁都不傻。想再指出这一点因为有人声称看过我去年的帖子...

Mfeous同学,你怀疑我给你举的例子,这点确实暴露了你的狭隘,因为你完全是为了证明你自己而去求证,而不是站在客观事实的基础上,我很清楚我给你再多的事实都不会改变你的看法,很遗憾,很抱歉我这么说。

本来是想去投诉这2个恶警,我不会改变我的称呼;因为当时的感受只有我自己知道。但限于各种原因,我确实没有再走下去;发这个帖子只是想给各位曾经或者将会受到不公正待遇的朋友打打气,或给一些新来乍到还不善于打官司解决问题的朋友一点启发,当然那些已经成功融入当地社会,张口闭口都要show off他的学识或给同胞以教育的人是不在此之列的;对于他们,我还不够格。

相反,假如这个帖子确实可以call on others to follow my example,那正是我的本意。
作者: nice    时间: 2006-4-26 19:41
Post by 春江花月夜
感谢各位朋友的跟贴,不管你是赞同我的做法,还是对此嗤之以鼻。

去年的帖子找不到了,如果有些朋友记得的话,应该记得我当时明确指出,在我前面的警车开在单行道上,这条街有2个道,警车跨着车道,换言之,完全赌塞了交通,而且没有给任何明示比如她们正在执行一项紧急的任务;否则我也不至于去对警车按喇叭,谁比谁都不傻。想再指出这一点因为有人声称看过我去年的帖子...

Mfeous同学,你怀疑我给你举的例子,这点确实暴露了你的狭隘,因为你完全是为了证明你自己而去求证,而不是站在客观事实的基础上,我很清楚我给你再多的事实都不会改变你的看法,很遗憾,很抱歉我这么说。

本来是想去投诉这2个恶警,我不会改变我的称呼;因为当时的感受只有我自己知道。但限于各种原因,我确实没有再走下去;发这个帖子只是想给各位曾经或者将会受到不公正待遇的朋友打打气,或给一些新来乍到还不善于打官司解决问题的朋友一点启发,当然那些已经成功融入当地社会,张口闭口都要show off他的学识或给同胞以教育的人是不在此之列的;对于他们,我还不够格。

相反,假如这个帖子确实可以call on others to follow my example,那正是我的本意。

严重同意,大大支持,多谢共享。
作者: 大将军    时间: 2006-4-26 20:31
楼主的精神可敬,不过也要知道,这个结局机呼是所有交通罚款上庭的结果.
作者: mfeous    时间: 2006-4-27 21:32
you considered the judge's mercy as evidence to support your cause, and someone even suggested that you could win if you bring the case to court. that is naive. i would say that the chances of winning are almost zero unless the judge treats you above the law. it happens sometimes, like the indian kirpan case.


actually, what really bothers me is not if you win the case or not, but rather the dangerous massage you send out to everyone from your first posting: let's fight agaist the authority.

you are promoting the distrust and conflict between the police and the new immigrants. please be aware that the police are not our enemies, it is the law offenders.

you think going to court is as simple as going to the grocery store. we are all rich, staying home doing nothing, and ready to sue anybody at any time.

you are misleading people, especially the newcomers. going to court should be reserved as the last alternative when we have a dispute.

you hit it right on the nail for your below point. it is not neccesary to wait till i become a policeman, the waiting time for the court hearing is already long enough to take at least one year also, as you know. pointless appeals like yours are to blame.

yet, this is your right. you finally have  hands on experience about what is going on in a canadian court. this is a canadian experince!




Post by 春江花月夜
i
And thanks God Mfeous were not a police. Otherwise there is too much overwhelming work for the court.

作者: FengFan    时间: 2006-4-28 10:42
对于从国内过来的移民来说,无论新老,大多数做事还是谨慎保守外加能忍则忍的,对警察当然更是客客气气的。除非有关系,在国内绝对是百姓怕警察的(警察们可是真会报复的),与这里比决不一样。基于这样大多数人的背景,楼主的做法是给大家以鼓励,既不要能忍则忍,当别人欺负你时,无论是谁,你要会维护自己尊严。这里不是国内,不少case没关系与钱,官司输的惨。这里的警察们虽大多很好公正,但也有少数素质确实低下的外加严重歧视的,我也遇到过。这里楼主的帖子已经很清楚了,点背遇到糟糕的警察还外加威胁,当然受不了,换作当地人也会去告(已咨询过几个当地的朋友)。

看看这里的大多是帖子,凡事总有支持与反对的,楼主也不用介意。但我个人双手支持你的这个帖子,鼓励!!!
作者: kstringing    时间: 2006-4-29 07:54
无论对错, 也要感谢楼主分享她/他的经历, 让我也学了点东西。 谢谢。
作者: mfeous    时间: 2006-4-29 15:37
to be a role model to let others follow, you did far from what you should do. indeed, you did not do anything except trying to waive your $95 fine in the court. this was deemed you were sued by the police by violating the law for not signing the registration certificate. you did not agree and appealed for that decision.

it had nothing to do with what you ultimately want: punishing the two police for abusing the  power.

why not sue the police by opening a file in the court? you brushed aside this question with a perfect excuse: too pre-occupied! you have not tried it out by yourself , how can you guarantee that others will be better off if they follow your sugestion,  if same kind of situation happens again, let alone other cases?


practice what you preach first.

Post by 春江花月夜
感谢各位朋友的跟贴,不管你是赞同我的做法,还是对此嗤之以鼻。

本来是想去投诉这2个恶警,我不会改变我的称呼;因为当时的感受只有我自己知道。但限于各种原因,我确实没有再走下去;发这个帖子只是想给各位曾经或者将会受到不公正待遇的朋友打打气,或给一些新来乍到还不善于打官司解决问题的朋友一点启发,当然那些已经成功融入当地社会,张口闭口都要show off他的学识或给同胞以教育的人是不在此之列的;对于他们,我还不够格。

相反,假如这个帖子确实可以call on others to follow my example,那正是我的本意。

作者: rangersbec    时间: 2006-4-30 11:24
2006年感动蒙城华人TOP 1
作者: minworm    时间: 2006-4-30 11:41
[QUOTE=春江花月夜]感谢各位朋友的跟贴,不管你是赞同我的做法,还是对此嗤之以鼻。

去年的帖子找不到了,如果有些朋友记得的话,应该记得我当时明确指出,在我前面的警车开在单行道上,这条街有2个道,警车跨着车道,换言之,完全赌塞了交通,而且没有给任何明示比如她们正在执行一项紧急的任务;否则我也不至于去对警车按喇叭,谁比谁都不傻。想再指出这一点因为有人声称看过我去年的帖子...

QUOTE]

我绝对支持你,如果警车这麽开的话,完全没有道理。
作者: frankdimmy    时间: 2006-4-30 11:52
标题: 支持搂主
支持搂主,过度理性会沦为懦弱和盲从,你的勇气我很钦佩!!!
作者: kongming    时间: 2006-5-1 17:41
标题: 春江华月夜,你可用search for thread 来搜索你去年的帖子
春江华月夜,你可用search for thread 来搜索你去年的帖子。
作者: youngn    时间: 2006-5-3 22:00
标题: 一定要上法庭,去年一共吃了700多的罚单
但是最后也只交了32+25的两张小停车罚单,一张扫雪拖车的罚单92未定,其余超速,停车的罚单全赢了!!!!!!!!!!!!
可见一定要声诉!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
作者: amu_xie    时间: 2006-5-3 22:12
支持楼主。不管如何,发出自己的声音。
楼上的mefous,挺烦你的,字里行间找错,纯粹为辩赢而辩。
作者: FengFan    时间: 2006-5-5 23:04
楼上说得好,为辨赢而辨。cool.
作者: joe03    时间: 2006-5-14 13:49
标题: Please give some idea.
楼主你好,
看到你的帖子很受鼓舞,我决定控告我的保险公司,也想多了解一下司法程序。
call me: 514-7683119
Joe
作者: tangyuanfang    时间: 2006-5-19 23:13
长久以来对蒙城的警察非常不满!!有事的时候通常迟迟不见他们出现,就会开罚单!!!我们已经收了很多次罚单了,不管什么原因都好,每次都交了,但今天遇到一个事真是太让人生气了!
我们晚上把车停在街边,规定是每天九点到十一点禁停,我们已经按照指示的时候去停了,但今天早上我老公去开车时,刚九点,站在车边上就有一个警察给开了个罚单,居然写了九点零一分到九点零二分!!!!真是离谱得可恨!!那个SB警察简直就是滥用职权!有谁知道怎么才能投诉那个警察?
作者: tangyuanfang    时间: 2006-5-19 23:17
Post by youngn
但是最后也只交了32+25的两张小停车罚单,一张扫雪拖车的罚单92未定,其余超速,停车的罚单全赢了!!!!!!!!!!!!
可见一定要声诉!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


怎么打的?把经验告诉大家分享分享。
作者: mfeous    时间: 2006-5-21 20:14
Post by tangyuanfang
长久以来对蒙城的警察非常不满!!有事的时候通常迟迟不见他们出现,就会开罚单!!!我们已经收了很多次罚单了,不管什么原因都好,每次都交了,但今天遇到一个事真是太让人生气了!
我们晚上把车停在街边,规定是每天九点到十一点禁停,我们已经按照指示的时候去停了,但今天早上我老公去开车时,刚九点,站在车边上就有一个警察给开了个罚单,居然写了九点零一分到九点零二分!!!!真是离谱得可恨!!那个SB警察简直就是滥用职权!有谁知道怎么才能投诉那个警察?

go to the court. but remember one thing: before judge asks you anything, telll him/her you are from  the mars. i garantee you will get your fine waived.

good luck
作者: Help_2003    时间: 2006-6-20 19:24
标题: 有中国人的骨气
朋友,你做得很对,凡事只有去争,才能得到。你不仅是在为自己争,也是在为中国人争。我们多数中国人太软弱了。有人会认为,最终警察还是平安无事。其实不然。在西方有个很厉害的东西就是"记录",虽然,警察未得到处罚,但若多次遭到投诉,会对她的升迁有影响的。
作者: tankmao    时间: 2006-6-23 20:44
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: Nikita-z    时间: 2006-6-26 01:06
标题: 我有一个类似的故事
我去年收到海关1000加币罚款通知书。我的报关代理是个儿香港人,见信后惊慌失措,要我去海关赶紧交款。罚款理由是我出口的货物未办理出口许可证,共3个货柜,罚1000;报关代理坚持交罚款,我当然也没招,但我总觉得不对头:我出口该品种以近2年,怎末以前没事现在突然来事了?我去海关交款前,坚持要他们给我解释清楚,为何罚我。结果,他们海关的人忙乎了一下午,终于搞明白了,原来是一场误会。是我那个报关代理人不小心把号码添错了,把我的不需要许可证管理的货物,列入许可证下面去了。这场误会是我明白,不要轻易就去交钱。他们政府,警察,银行等搞错是常有的事。
作者: lanny_sh    时间: 2006-7-5 13:52
Post by youngn
但是最后也只交了32+25的两张小停车罚单,一张扫雪拖车的罚单92未定,其余超速,停车的罚单全赢了!!!!!!!!!!!!
可见一定要声诉!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

呵呵,你太夸张了,怎么会有那么多罚单?
作者: vincent_s    时间: 2006-7-24 07:18
标题: Ding
DingDingDing
作者: youngn    时间: 2006-8-2 20:33
标题: 去年一年的罚单以及结果
Post by lanny_sh
呵呵,你太夸张了,怎么会有那么多罚单?

1,限速50KM,被控超速51KM(警察大叔每天风雨无阻地埋伏在上下班的路上,终于被逮到了),一张365$.--申诉:证据不足---没有结果,自动撤消。

2,儿童医院门口,在高峰期3:30-5:30,停在BUS和TAXI专用线上。$--申诉:标示牌不清楚--没有结果,自动撤消

3,因为扫雪被拖车,一张92---申诉:插标牌太晚,没有看见--胜诉,撤消

4,OTTAWA停车25刀,参见http://www.sinoquebec.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=217439,认罚

5,2次睡懒觉,忘记趴车位置,38$EACH,共76$,认罚


共计:胜诉 595$, 认罚101$
作者: ipcc    时间: 2012-2-10 10:41
楼主是好样的。上庭要等10个月啊 ?




欢迎光临 蒙城华人网 (https://www.sinoquebec.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.1