Post by Magic18
"Explode is just a dumbed down version of Blow..."
explode is more specific...
blow could be used under many other circumstances
blow up and explode can be inter-changable
Post by Magic18
"like, a man normally wants a blowjob, not an explodejob."
exactly my point....
explode and blow do not have the same meaning....
btw, just that you know, "it does not BlOW after 1 minute of launch." as matter of fact makes less sense....
you GET a blowjob.... as in "blow me.." you dont actually blow unless you're the one giving it... well, whatever makes you happy.....
Thus, you should be saying "it does not explode after 1 minute of launch"
or "it does not blow up after 1 minute of launch"
again..."blow up" (not blow) and explode are inter-changable.....
Post by christmas111
man your argument is awesome.
it is 100% logical, if your assumption that "a joke must be grammatically/scientifically correct to make sense" makes sense.
Although any of my potential innuendo (or figure of speech as a dumbed down version) is already blown away by you, I still feel the pleasure...from you. I mean, scientifically, from chatting with you.
you see it is very hard for me to either try hard (telling a joke) or remain hard (trying) in the face of a great person like you who truly understands "blow" and can use IT with both grammatical and scientific correctness.
Post by Magic18
i just have a problem with you trying to make something that was ok into something that's less appropriate.... and the worst thing is that you wont admit the obvious....
btw, if you have to work on your sarcasm as well...
a joke doesnt have to be grammatically correct.. it should be funny... but in your case... it was neither.... so you'd rather have it correct first..... maybe add some humor next time.....
Post by EMI
he couldn't come up with an better word....he argued....but now he admits...
can we let this post sink now???
欢迎光临 蒙城华人网 (https://www.sinoquebec.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.1 |