标题: 和slush公司的纠纷 [打印本页] 作者: sylntx 时间: 2006-11-18 12:35 标题: 和slush公司的纠纷 昨天收到slush公司的律师信，要求我们在48小时内交付3500加币的罚款，否则上庭。请教在这方面有经验的同行，如果上庭胜诉的可能性有多大?最坏的结果是什么?万分感谢！作者: 重剑无锋 时间: 2006-11-18 13:11
没有前因后果的直接就要罚你款吗?作者: wuti 时间: 2006-11-18 13:28 标题: WHy? Why???? You should tell us your story before asking questions. Only in this way, you may get some usefull suggetions. Good luck.
Post by sylntx
昨天收到slush公司的律师信，要求我们在48小时内交付3500加币的罚款，否则上庭。请教在这方面有经验的同行，如果上庭胜诉的可能性有多大?最坏的结果是什么?万分感谢！
以我的经历，老外的文化和我们有很多不同，有时候你好好和他们讲是没用的，他们脑子里有一种根深蒂固的东西，我们该用法律来保护自己。几年里，我被逼给不同的公司和人发过五六封信，也上小额法庭告过一家公司，每次我都赢了。近来，又遇上了完全不公平的对待，我一直在考虑去小额法庭过过招。人不犯我，我不犯人，人若犯我，我决饶不了，特别是对有些老外，他们的确欠揍。作者: diorlancome 时间: 2007-3-6 00:44
i told u this is a famous case which has been quoted very often in legal books.
why not check other tips here? or just look for some similar precedents?
file your case before the court of small claims. this is the best way.
the key points: how often u use materials of others? the time that Slush gives u is enough for u to correct your own wrongs?- stop using others' materials.
perhaps Slush gives u no time to recover what u broke. that's how Slush montreal; slush trois rivieres; slush laval... make money.
i know the contract u concluded with Slush is not fair?
for Slush is the judge of his own contract; Slush takes the power of judging from the judge. this is all.作者: vincent_s 时间: 2007-3-6 14:51 标题: 法律的是基于公正的原则建立的 上法庭不是为了赢，而是去讲理的！
如果觉得有理就上法庭，尽量搜集证据，就算输了，长一智。