买二手车, 分享教训, 请求支援!

classic · 发表于 2012-3-26 20:39

见上面的回帖, 有人认为这不是骗子. 其实西人里面骗子还是不少的, 所以和他们打交道应该先小人,后君子. 害人之心不可有, 防人之心不可无.

无敌陆虎. · 发表于 2012-4-1 20:05

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w

unctuationKerning/> <w

rawingGridVerticalSpacing>7.8 pt</w

rawingGridVerticalSpacing> <w

isplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w

isplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery> <w

isplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>2</w

isplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery> <w:Compatibility> <w:SpaceForUL/> <w:BalanceSingleByteDoubleByteWidth/> <w

oNotLeaveBackslashAlone/> <w:ULTrailSpace/> <w

oNotExpandShiftReturn/> <w:AdjustLineHeightInTable/> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:UseFELayout/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->

Post by tshiyin;3064467
首先声明，没有抬杠或者挑战权威的意思。只是听我公司本地同事说，她卖车时是卖给dealer的，虽然少卖些银子，但事后不用负任何法律责任。如果卖给私人，则需在一月内承担责任。至于什么责任，可能需要专家才能解释了。也许老外只是担心可能的麻烦，宁愿少卖点钱。

事不辩不明，只有不断的挑战权威，社会才能不断的进步吗！开个玩笑，不过很高兴跟你抬扛，所以我查了魁省关于私人间汽车买卖相关责任的描述如下：（链接http://www.caaquebec.com/Automob ... 5f1f8d2&lang=en）

Are you required to provide a warranty? The Consumer Protection Act does not apply to private sales; only merchants are required to declare warranties, on vehicles less than five years old and with fewer than 80,000 kilometres on the odometer. The Civil Code of Québec, however, states that the seller must warrant to the buyer that the item sold is free of latent defects. The Civil Code defines latent defects as those that render the property for sale “unfit for the use for which it was intended or which so diminish its usefulness that the buyer would not have bought it or paid so high a price if he had been aware of them.” The warranty applies to the property sold as well as any accessories. An apparent defect is one “that can be perceived by a prudent and diligent buyer without any need of expert assistance.”

车主私人卖车需要提供保修吗？“消费者权益保护法”并不适用于私人间买卖；仅仅商业交易对于5年以下8W公里以内的车提供保修。然而魁省民法指出，卖方必须保证出售车辆没有潜在缺陷。 “民法典定义潜在缺陷为要出售的车辆不适宜使用或削弱其功能，买方不应该买或支付如此高的价格，如果卖家已经知道所售车辆潜在缺陷。“保修适用于销售车辆以及任何附件。这个明显缺陷是一个买家通过谨慎和细致的检查后，而不需要任何专家协助就可以发现的。

我的理解是：消费者权益保护法不保护私人间车辆买卖，仅保护如果从DEALER买车受骗；魁省民法要求私人卖方必须保证出售车辆没有潜在缺陷，买家需谨慎和细致的检查。

不足之处请各位大侠指正。

Improve · 发表于 2012-4-4 19:33

楼主，通过这段民法，你一定能打赢官司了。因为发动机里面的问题是靠专家检查才能发现的。

Post by 无敌陆虎.;3067750


The Civil Code of Québec, however, states that the seller must warrant to the buyer that the item sold is free of latent defects. The Civil Code defines latent defects as those that render the property for sale “unfit for the use for which it was intended or which so diminish its usefulness that the buyer would not have bought it or paid so high a price if he had been aware of them.” The warranty applies to the property sold as well as any accessories. An apparent defect is one “that can be perceived by a prudent and diligent buyer without any need of expert assistance.”

魁省民法指出，卖方必须保证出售车辆没有潜在缺陷。 “民法典定义潜在缺陷为要出售的车辆不适宜使用或削弱其功能，买方不应该买或支付如此高的价格，如果卖家已经知道所售车辆潜在缺陷。“保修适用于销售车辆以及任何附件。这个明显缺陷是一个买家通过谨慎和细致的检查后，而不需要任何专家协助就可以发现的。

RZ3031 · 发表于 2012-7-13 18:11

我10年底花1000块给老婆买了辆94年的NISSAN ALTIMA，当时在DEARLER那里看了一辆相同年份的相同型号的车，里面又黑又脏还要价1200元。平时只是去上学来回往火车站开（3公里左右），偶尔周末我开远一些的地方。到现在磕磕碰碰，车身有些擦伤和锈蚀，但车身和机械性能一直没有问题，今年刚换了排气管，现在老婆用不到这辆车了，如果谁有兴趣的话500块转让。有意请发站内信联系。