删帖再发，只因为生命是人权的底线！
既然魁北克的独立问题和加拿大原住民的人权问题都是加拿大言论自由的禁区，那么谈谈作为少数族裔群体之一的华人那些悬而不决的离奇命案吧！Chinese Lives Matter As Well！
2013年3 月18日，蒙特利尔山东青年崔晓明在幡然醒悟其私人存款有欺诈嫌疑后3天，“暴病”猝逝，虽然有网友不懈追踪爆料其背后可能的犯罪黑幕，相关部门以及警方都无动于衷；
2014年4月30日，蒙特利尔华人李建萍与其子卢晓风由其丈夫报失踪，虽然有网友爆料死者的丈夫（孩子的父亲）问题很明显，但此案至今无解；
2016年2月19日，蒙特利尔华人白领陈慧在失踪数天后由同居男友报失踪， “闺蜜”一边在媒体“缅怀”她，一边高额悬赏寻下落。警方按照上述知情者提供的“线索”在其居所附近查找，无果；三个月后，陈慧尸体被发现在只有驱车才能抛弃的地方，此案至今在警方仍然没有进展；
2016年6月12日，多伦多华裔女子李迎春失踪，警方先是在黄金救人时间内以工作量太大为由拒绝调看监控录像；后来又莫名其妙发布一个查找另一女子的通告，表示对受害者还活着有信心。最后在受害人生还渺茫，嫌疑人匿逃的事实情况下，8月11日，加拿大警方发布题为《李迎春案新进展：华裔嫌犯买春 威胁妓女生命》的新闻，对逝者暗泼脏水。
关于崔晓明案疑点：
网上一直有人爆料崔晓明的离奇猝逝背后与山东同乡之间流传的“银行个人存款上限不能超过1万2“谣言有关，疑似有人以此为名经营黑箱个人存款。有知情者爆料：崔晓明在猝逝前3天对上述谣言恍然大悟，有意报警。3天后他就离奇猝逝，时间是2013年3月18日。此后不久，
2013年4月13日，山东同乡会用同乡会账户在网上号召捐款：
可是官方的信息显示：该同乡会成立于2013年4月16日！也就是说山东同乡会在成立之前就通过了捐款慈善审批，并拥有了同乡会捐款账户，好神通！
山东同乡会一边“查找晓明的失踪存款”，一边筹措捐款，然后就有下面的消息出笼：
也就是说，当同乡会筹措了$21，776.81 + ￥4000捐款时，他们也同时声称晓明的$25000存款中的多数已找到。究竟是找到存款，还是把捐款“模糊”成找到的存款，没有人说清！
那么山东同乡会究竟有没有可能是象爆料说的那样黑箱经营个人存款？
背景常识：
在魁省，任何组织机构只有在成立注册后才能获得NEQ号，只有有了NEQ号才能到银行开户。 其次，大部分的非盈利组织不能随意组织捐款，只有符合政府要求的慈善机构才能募捐，审批严格且耗时，不可能在机构成立之前获得审批。
关于陈慧一案：
魁北克少数族裔妇女的艰难时世！/It’s the Hard Time for the Minority Women in Quebec!警方在找到尸体后排除了自杀可能（http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/mo ... -lawrence-1.3577535），并且引用某“闺蜜”的原话：“had ‘already thought of the worst’ after her friend vanished”。说真的，看过闺蜜在陈慧失踪初期接受采访录像的人都看得出来：寄希望于生还的人会说出缅怀的话吗？另外，当初新闻里说陈慧“left her home on foot”，而她的尸体被发现在距离她的家很远的地方。如此看来，当初提供的这一信息显然是不实之词，警方没有追问吗？http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/mo ... eal-woman-1.3457802
另外，此“闺蜜”先是对媒体说“It’s not like her at all”（ 完全不像她的做法）。然后又说，“Guo said she last spoke to Chen on the evening of Feb. 18 and they had plans to play cards together the following day. On that Friday, something came up in Guo’s schedule and she sent her best friend two text messages asking if they could get together instead on Saturday.“She never answered me,” Guo said, adding that “everything seemed OK” 当她们在18号，“传说中”最后一次电话中商量19号聚会，而19号郭某给陈慧发了两个短信都没有得到回复（“She never answered me”），这位“闺蜜”却对媒体说“everything seemed OK”（ 一切都正常）这是什么逻辑？！警察居然没有调查！
*****************************ENGLISH VERSION********************************
As Chinese people in Canada, we all have some experiences of barriers to human rights justice to share. The Quebec issue and the Indigenous people’s human rights which are taboo for the Canadian authorities may not interest us, but崔晓明、李建萍、陈慧、李迎春 cases tell us that we may have been joined with the Aboriginal community in the sense of having more and more missing and murdered cases without enough attention paid to the investigation.
崔晓明case: He was found dead on March 18, 2013, allegedly 3 days after he intended to report a scam issue. The NFP organization, Rassemblement de Compatriotes du Shandong started collecting donation under his death on April 13, 2013 with the organization’s bank account (TD BANK, No.: 0361100482625258288) whereas the registration records show that the organization was incorporated on April 16, 2013, incorporated after it obtained a bank account, how true is it? Is it legal? As for the saving ($25,000) under崔晓明’s name that the organization was allegedly trying to recover from unknown source, on April 25, the organization declared that they recovered the majority of the saving, but did not mention from where and how much they recovered it. Meanwhile, they announced that the donation reached $21,776.81 + ￥4000. Did they arrange the donation of which the legitimacy is still in question in order to cover up something illegal? What is clear is that the vice-president of the organization, 刘薇 is in financial business.
李建萍 case: She and her song Xiao Feng Lu have been missing since April 30, 2014, reported by her husband. Two years after, despite the questionable behaviours of the husband discussed on the Internet, the case remains in investigation.
陈慧case: Her missing was reported days after by her boyfriend who lived with her. The police said “she left her home on foot” on February 19, 2016 at midnight. Three months later, her body was found in the St. Lawrence River where only vehicles can reach that far in that circumstance. Did someone lie to the police? Her “friends” offered a $10,000 reward for information but what she talked to the media sounds like mourning for her. Did she know for sure that 陈慧 would not be able to back when she “prayed” for her back? The friend referred 陈慧’s missing as “it’s not like her at all”, however, when she talked about the two messages she sent to 陈慧 without receiving any reply, she said “everything seemed OK”. Did the police question her on this paradox?
李迎春 case: She has been missing since June 12, 2016. According to the media, during the 72-hour golden window for rescue, the police refused to look at the surveillance footage under the pretext of too much work. In July, the police started looking for another woman, a witness, saying that they were looking forward to finding李迎春 alive. Turns out, in August, the investigators said she “is now presumed dead”. Meanwhile, the police discredited the victim and linked her to “women in the sex trade” by announcing, I quote “A 21-year-old man facing a manslaughter charge in connection to the disappearance of a Markham woman now being considered a danger to women in the sex trade, police warn. Jiarui, or Jerry, Tang is wanted on a Canada-wide warrant for manslaughter in connection to the disappearance of Ying Chun (Annie) Li.”
https://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2016/08/11/man-wanted-by-police-for-homicide-may-be-threat-to-sex-workers.htmlThose cases are instructive and pointed to the very fact that although it is being said “all lives matter”, we Chinese people’s lives in Canada are treated as the aboriginal people, or even worse!
发表于 2016-9-1 13:05
转发
收藏
转播
分享
淘帖
支持
反对
提升卡
关闭主题卡
开启主题卡
楼主
冬天来了 今天魁省有90公里大风
11月21日 珠海再发生汽车恶意撞人事件（视
世纪超市本周特价
Canadian Tire黑五早价