|
加拿大National Post12月16又发一篇关于蒙大教授吴柯 “两天通吃”的文章, 题目是:Reports that he has parallel career in Ch日ina are 'absolute nonsense' says top Montreal engineering professor 作者是Tom Blackwell
' u& `3 |( U7 E2 C& k. z
8 s9 Y7 L4 w& O. b2 r' @! c( ?该文故意引用吴柯对自己的辩护, 说自己作为海外“观察员”去北京参加政协会议,是为中共政协带去“新鲜空气”。信息不对称一直是有的中国人玩的把戏, 可惜吴柯现在玩的不是时候,现在西方国家对中共及其统战组织已经相当的了解了,使得吴柯的诡辩异常滑稽可笑。他不是海外华侨推选出来,更不是所在国派他去做观察员的,他是中共花百姓纳税人钱请去装潢假民主的。不以为耻,反以为荣。
' o1 Z% T$ N. x) J# o* x1 P* l7 O& H( |& H1 k5 o& X
; K; o" W3 x* K* I+ uAnd he said his 2011 role as a delegate to Beijing’s People’s Political Consultative Conference was purely as an observer and to introduce “fresh air” to the Communist Party advisory body.
+ K! u* M+ |6 d Y! b
1 }) p2 F2 ?1 }8 d/ M6 T看看中共党报《人民日报》如何看待这些中共花百姓纳税人钱请去北京的海外代表的:, B, C! z6 D$ F c! s7 Y) d( A
+ i" U2 m4 Q6 M% i RBut how does the People's Daily of the Communist Party of China introduce these invited overseas representatives? 【The 39 overseas Chinese who were invited to attend this year's National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference will enter the venue with the trust of overseas Chinese. During the meeting, they will give advice and suggestions and give voice to the overseas Chinese community. …..Once in attendance, unforgettable forever. As a member of the delegates, these overseas Chinese have witnessed the open and transparent democratic process of the ancestral (home) country. It is a lofty honor and a profound significance. ….They all have a common feature, that is, they have been active in the overseas Chinese community in their country for a long time, contributed to the development of their ancestral (home) country, and have a strong ability to advise and offer advice. ….Coming from all over the world, each of the overseas Chinese representatives has his own responsibility…..】So, what responsibility that Wu Ke shoulders is obvious to all the Chinese Communities in Canada. All expenses for trips to Beijing’s People’s Political Consultative Conference and Chinese Oversea United Front Activities were paid by CCP.
' L6 ^# |, k' w: D. D1 _, c5 p) n. e5 Q" ^! ]# F1 P
文章特别提到National Post在10月16日文章发表之前,多次联系吴柯, 但是吴就是不回复。他以为不回答记者,人家文章就不会发表。结果打错了算盘。6 P) B$ n) `9 S4 j
(Wu did not respond to repeated requests for comment at the time)* ?' D& Y$ G, q2 T1 [
8 S8 s1 ~/ B. I3 F4 ADuring that period of time, he was in China for doing his duties。
2 J) n7 \7 e% G* b& m1 y9 i D# g8 y+ r( x
出来混,迟早要还的。 |
|