|
To Zee:
First of all, do you miss some my questions?
To your points:
1. “even the whole Europe is dependent on US,”
Are you making mistakes? The whole Europe throve from 14th century when the movement of humanism started. US is only after 2nd world war. What are you talking about? I am talking about the origin of civilization or the cultivation of the world. One step back, the whole Europe was dependent on US, US was depending on whom?
2. “african are way way behind civilization than Chinese,”
Can I get the conclusion that Chinese were civilized?
“however, South Africa, after being colonized by Europeans, is still among the most developed country in the continent.”
Is south Africa is different from other South African countries? What is the difference? From what you said above, Can I conclude that colonialism is helping the development of a country and a nation? Do I misunderstand you or are you misleading the readers? Can you give a definite answer?
3. “HK people migrated to Canada because they feared CCP to death when HK was handed over to CCP”
Why the Mainlanders should love to be under the control of communism all their life? Why they should give up the opportunities to get rid of communist control?
“I am not quite sure why Taiwanese migrate, but their number is not as many as those of HKness and mainlanders”
You yourself don’t know the reason of immigration of Taiwanese, Why are you curious about the fact that mainlanders were immigrating one after another? How do you get the conclusion “one after another”? Why you only ask the motivation of immigration of mainlanders instead of Taiwanese?
4. “i said as A GROUP.”
I admit there is some reason in what you said. However, AS A GROUP, why don’t give the examples of Taiwanese or Hknese?
5. “don't be stupid, son.”
Don’t use the insulting words, or I could be more offensive. It is an equal argument on both sides.
“it's a matter of perfection of system in Taiwan, while it's a matter of existence of system in mainland.”
OK, you may insist on it. However, perfection or existence, it is the same to me. You may think that it is perfection in TW while existence or non-existence in ML. What I can tell you is that this perfection exists in your illusion.
6. “Li Denghui is denounced by most Taiwaness”
You said that TW was a democratic country, at least everyone could elect whoever to be president. Li was not the person you Taiwanese elected? How did you use the democracy? How could you elect someone to be president while he did not represent TW. Can you further explain the perfect democratic system in TW?
7. “MT911 wants to make friends with mainlander fellows but get snubbed, that's because mainlanders are so evil that nobody can trust nobody no more”
Do you agree to the conclusion of passerby113, that is he (she? I am not sure) has two neighbors from HK and TW who are prostitutes here in Montreal, so all the ladies from HK and TW are doing the same? Are you willing to give a direct answer to this question?
8. “I don't negate myself as a member chinese nationality, I just point out a simple fact that mainlanders are bad due to the fact they are from a land on the road to perdiction.”
I don’t agree. There are good natured and bad natured people everywhere. Maybe you only meet or see the bad natured mainlanders, but your conclusion is not acceptable.
Finally, as a personal advise, spend more time to improve your English! |
|