In normal case, if anyone said he/she gets parent's VISA to USA IN MONTREAL recently, he/she is either a very lucky person (go go buy 649) or a cheater (but losing money to USA does no good for himself/herself, why do so?). * D% \) F. h& M$ ]2 o* m$ a/ p
0 c2 G3 f4 ^6 B" k" T
I mean in normal case. If the old man has a son or daughter in USA, or other relationships, that's another story.2 p1 E- e+ f l- n
- I3 x! l6 J% R7 g, T"where did u get that 100%?" good question. I think no answer but it's an experience earned with money.:frown:
Post by Robby & Nancy . h- t* u8 O! u
where did u get that 100%? :eek!:
5 ?& ~; x. w5 F$ C6 U2 q
The travel agents here. They have seen a lot of the cases and so far NO successful cases. I guess they have no reason to lie to me as this type of answer gives them less business and customers. Of course, I wish they were wrong. The argument here is about fact, not about position.
1)最近 1~2 年 in Montreal4 R% M0 F+ |% V& G0 m
2)又说人家是骗子. exclude special cases (like xdjm in USA). : r4 J) Y6 D% rMany people were refused (a fact you have to admit), he/she got it. Can't you say he/she a lucky one? 2 ?! }; L$ F' h. ?He/She didn't get VISA but pretended to. Can't you say he/she a cheater? :mad: 8 C1 u2 L6 [% Y D2 D+ P2 q / B+ P, m' F I2 E5 n"你的说法太绝对了吧! 100%被拒是最近一周, 一个月, 一年..... 签证通过率怎么也比中649头奖高吧(难道你是指中5块钱), 又说人家是骗子, 没必要吧. " + \! W' R) s& m# h3 t7 f M ) y2 D) K' G+ M8 L
3) If 200 USD is nothing to you, just go there in Montreal. 2 V# B7 y5 y4 R% A( X# m
4) I know there are the successful cases in Ottwa. I think it's better to go to Ontario.