shenyj

如图所示，请大家帮助判定一下A车和B车的责任界定(B车撞到A车的中后部)。

是全责还是部分责任，各占比例是多少？

因我保的是单险，如果不认同保险公司的责任认定，应该向哪个部门或者说如何申述?

谢谢！

mongoose_SDK

100% A - I guess. Not so sure.

I had a similar case: a car was making a U turn, I was dring normally. The car hit me in the back door. In this case, it held 100% responsibility.

But in your case, car B hit car A in the back door, maybe it should have some % of repsonsibility.

What did the police say?

Anyway if nobady was injured, police would show up very slowly and basically do nothing. So the only one you can turn to is your insurance company - that is your last defence (if you need one ).

rickwu

100 % A的责任， 100000%sure

shenyj

谢谢回复，与你案件中不相同的是B车撞到A车的中后部。

QC

个人根据对加拿大道路交通路权的理解，我认为A应负全责，跟撞到那个部位关系不大。

shenyj

保险公司正在做认定，也问过一些经验丰富的朋友，有说A全责，有说B全责，有说各有责任，

resp-vendor

按照谁肇事谁负责的普世价值观（最近中国领导和中国媒体经常用“普世价值观”这个词，我也借用一下）。如果你同意A车是肇事者的话，那么前面几位说的A负100%责任是没错的。

如果你不同意A是肇事方，那么，人家B车往前行驶着好好的，没招惹谁，怎么会有事故呢？所以，整个事故是由A车引起。

jasperlin

没理解错的话,你是从PARKING的位置转到行车线,
行车线上的车有优先权,你必须保证让他们车先行,就如同在十字路口,你有STOP标志,别人没有,就意味着别人有优先权.
有一点可以ARGUE,就是别人的车超速.

cyljw

A车 99999999999999999999999999%的责任

ver登

Post by fadala
B has the right of the way.
But if A hited B's back bumper, it is different

How is it possible A hit B's back bumper?