租房买房买生意上iU91
楼主: linsunrise
打印 上一主题 下一主题

你家附近的房价跌了吗?

[复制链接]   [推荐给好友]
21#
发表于 2008-12-17 09:45 | 只看该作者
我想买房子的地方房价都没降,强烈希望他们降价。
有些房子要的虚高,降几万也是应该的,比如我们家附近有套房子07年建的时候卖40万,08年有人卖的时候竟然要价55万,有点太离谱了,还不降价自然卖不出去,而附近的其他房子卖的都挺快(除了那套55万的house和一个22万的condo,condo看的人不少,但是由于没有车库不好卖)基本上1个月都卖出去了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

22#
发表于 2008-12-17 13:56 | 只看该作者
Post by lulu.liu
你那里是哪个区?
夹在saint-laurent river 和 champlain 运河之间这一块,一小部分属于verdun,大部分属于lassalle。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

23#
发表于 2008-12-17 13:57 | 只看该作者
Post by lulu.liu
现在房子的回报率是15-20年左右。 10年而且在市中心....很难找。
’回报率是15-20年左右‘是什么意思?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

24#
发表于 2008-12-18 12:36 | 只看该作者
Post by lulu.liu
就是房子的价格是房子每年毛收入的15到20倍。
没这么夸张吧?每年毛收入的15到20倍,那你算算还有收入吗?肯定不如存GIC合适.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

25#
发表于 2008-12-18 13:31 | 只看该作者
一般来说,10 倍左右才又投资价值。

Post by 帖子
没这么夸张吧?每年毛收入的15到20倍,那你算算还有收入吗?肯定不如存GIC合适.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

26#
发表于 2008-12-18 13:50 | 只看该作者
You can find it with 10 times of revenue, but it is not on Montreal Island. It is too much risky to buy it outside of montreal  at present situation. I will buy a triplex or fourplex which has +cash flow and good center location of Montreal right away in any economical situation.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

27#
发表于 2008-12-18 14:04 | 只看该作者
Good center location (plateau or downtown,ndg, gay village) on Montreal Island +good rental income+ without big renovation. It is much better than put your money in bank at any economical crisis! It is best stratege for beginner of real estate.You never gonna lose your money if follow this rule. unless you have very very bad luck!!

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

28#
发表于 2008-12-19 15:56 | 只看该作者
Buying a home in Montréal is more profitable

Contrary to popular belief, buying a single-family home in Montréal can be very profitable. Considering the indexed value of the property, a real-estate investment offers better performance for families who choose to live in Montréal.

Let’s take as an example two families, each of whom buys a single-family home. Both families are composed of two working adults and a young child. They earn the average income of the greater Montréal area. However, each makes a choice that will have a major impact on its savings.

Let’s compare…

The Beauséjour family bought a one-storey house on the South Shore for $217,000. The Arsenault family decided to buy a cottage in Montréal for $297,000. Over a 25-year period, which of the two homes will be the greater family asset?

The Beauséjours make yearly mortgage payments of $14,400, while the Arsenaults’ yearly mortgage payments come to $23,448.

Despite the apparent savings at the time of purchase, the Beauséjours spend $31,421 annually on taxes, public transportation and the costs related to having two family cars. The Arsenaults only spend $23,783 for taxes, public transportation and the costs related to their single car.

The reality is that the two families’ expenses end up being about the same, since each family is using the money in their own way, saving on certain expenses but spending more on others.

Favourable indexing

To get an idea of both families’ financial assets, we must check the progressive value of their homes. The value of the Arsenaults’ home is likely to increase by 5 percent per year, while the Beauséjours’ home will increase by 4.3 percent, using the average indexing rates registered over the past 15 years. These rates were calculated using data from the Greater Montréal Real Estate Board.

Considering the purchase value of both homes, the family asset of the Montréal family’s home will be around $380,000 greater than the home of the family living on the South Shore. The value of the Arsenault family’s home will be around $995,000 in 2029. Living in Montréal is possible … and it pays!


en
for(i=0;i
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

jem'enfous2 该用户已被删除
29#
发表于 2008-12-29 13:30 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

30#
发表于 2009-1-12 09:34 | 只看该作者
周末去两家建筑商那里看房子,从看房的人数和他们卖房的速度觉得蒙特利尔的房价很难降(一些要价虚高的二手房除外)。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

Copyright © 1999 - 2024 by Sinoquebec Media Inc. All Rights Reserved 未经许可不得摘抄  |  GMT-5, 2024-12-28 13:30 , Processed in 0.053982 second(s), 40 queries .