Why not try in Ottwa? More chance to succeed.2 y) h8 f) g0 Y
/ F2 N8 k0 N) y
In Montreal, almost 0%. Why not save this 200 USD (at least 100USD)?' @ A- j8 ]' K) I4 P$ y1 c, o4 x
In normal case, if anyone said he/she gets parent's VISA to USA IN MONTREAL recently, he/she is either a very lucky person (go go buy 649) or a cheater (but losing money to USA does no good for himself/herself, why do so?). / H- Q4 ^5 \7 V9 {) w# r0 Q, e4 R1 F
0 ^! z7 u* G' S, ZI mean in normal case. If the old man has a son or daughter in USA, or other relationships, that's another story. n6 s6 f( I3 L1 `3 D 3 ^( A1 P* u$ y+ f. q5 S' t: q2 \9 k"where did u get that 100%?" good question. I think no answer but it's an experience earned with money.:frown:
Post by Robby & Nancy 0 P8 L5 j; B( u# K
where did u get that 100%? :eek!:
' L" n& ^) m2 ]8 g+ Z; s
The travel agents here. They have seen a lot of the cases and so far NO successful cases. I guess they have no reason to lie to me as this type of answer gives them less business and customers. Of course, I wish they were wrong. The argument here is about fact, not about position.
1)最近 1~2 年 in Montreal $ ~' @' a8 C; r2)又说人家是骗子. exclude special cases (like xdjm in USA). 9 ~+ F, X: C wMany people were refused (a fact you have to admit), he/she got it. Can't you say he/she a lucky one? # s% x1 F8 q) R+ t/ x0 x
He/She didn't get VISA but pretended to. Can't you say he/she a cheater? :mad: 1 A1 b6 m9 D1 O. O9 @: N
5 d2 u8 ^; {7 l) V% B/ ~' h
"你的说法太绝对了吧! 100%被拒是最近一周, 一个月, 一年..... 签证通过率怎么也比中649头奖高吧(难道你是指中5块钱), 又说人家是骗子, 没必要吧. " 5 {& u: O2 d' I# I8 |1 C1 n 0 O6 a6 ^. N1 l3) If 200 USD is nothing to you, just go there in Montreal. # B- B% c! g3 `% P3 {& `% P n
4) I know there are the successful cases in Ottwa. I think it's better to go to Ontario.