In normal case, if anyone said he/she gets parent's VISA to USA IN MONTREAL recently, he/she is either a very lucky person (go go buy 649) or a cheater (but losing money to USA does no good for himself/herself, why do so?). / J$ G7 ]0 ~8 Q8 A4 j 9 d# l/ B4 V% m9 e) ?I mean in normal case. If the old man has a son or daughter in USA, or other relationships, that's another story. . j6 {4 k' l6 c1 J# Z& v: Y " ]: d8 r0 g" |0 b0 C! |7 u
"where did u get that 100%?" good question. I think no answer but it's an experience earned with money.:frown:
Post by Robby & Nancy ; _ _. W2 f$ g8 r4 Z# g where did u get that 100%? :eek!:
9 A! z- e6 [3 H0 M: k" f6 R, C
The travel agents here. They have seen a lot of the cases and so far NO successful cases. I guess they have no reason to lie to me as this type of answer gives them less business and customers. Of course, I wish they were wrong. The argument here is about fact, not about position.
1)最近 1~2 年 in Montreal0 v! R& v- U! w7 O* D
2)又说人家是骗子. exclude special cases (like xdjm in USA). ! e, X2 m* q5 T& N* V& U- CMany people were refused (a fact you have to admit), he/she got it. Can't you say he/she a lucky one? % z, J) L. j8 JHe/She didn't get VISA but pretended to. Can't you say he/she a cheater? :mad: " \& K9 f, J% n" q+ F1 \ 7 G) l- B/ G1 i: |" ?) l"你的说法太绝对了吧! 100%被拒是最近一周, 一个月, 一年..... 签证通过率怎么也比中649头奖高吧(难道你是指中5块钱), 又说人家是骗子, 没必要吧. " 8 e/ q7 s+ ?1 ^# `- g 1 w6 _4 ~) n3 n) U/ B3) If 200 USD is nothing to you, just go there in Montreal. . S! Z2 F4 {" {5 Y( `4) I know there are the successful cases in Ottwa. I think it's better to go to Ontario.