租房买房买生意上iU91
12
返回列表
楼主: 9494
打印 上一主题 下一主题

如此美国,不让你爱都不行

[复制链接]   [推荐给好友]
11#
发表于 2014-9-20 14:46 | 只看该作者
Post by mzmy;3433591
如果你真的以为美国政府或者加拿大政府有这样的FreePass, 你该看医生了.  

This is built-in unspoken discrimination in the system.
On the surface, it is justice for all.

For insignificant matters, you might get a fair trial,
but when push comes to shove in serious matters,
you lose out all the time.

That is the case with vincent chin(陳果仁).
The killers literally get away with murder.

Even after 30 years later,
today the so-called court judgement for compensation is still not respected.
How can you call it justice for all?
And naive people actually believe in that "slogan"!

Regarding the case in the original post of "中美混血儿童的监护权 ",
let's change the ethnic orgins of the divorced couple,
for example, the father is Chinese American, the mother is non-Chinese American.

If the mother takes the kid to other country,
would the Chinese father gets such a "happy" ending
if he contacts the authority 20 minutes before the mother flies off with the kid?

If you think the Chinese father would get the kid back, dream on.
The chance is very slim.

If you don't believe, try it out.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

12#
发表于 2014-9-20 20:56 | 只看该作者
Post by helloman;3433675
This is built-in unspoken discrimination in the system.
On the surface, it is justice for all.
很遗憾你眼里的世界是这个样子. 作为凡人, 咱们还是不要太高估自己的能力了.
Optimism is mandatory.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

13#
发表于 2014-9-21 09:52 | 只看该作者
Post by mzmy;3433833
很遗憾你眼里的世界是这个样子. 作为凡人, 咱们还是不要太高估自己的能力了.

Of course I wish that the American/Canadian society is fair and just
because we all live here and surely hope that it is the case.

However the reality is not quite so rosy.

For the moment, look into just a few areas:
1. School.
School admission rate.
ie. Chinese/Asian quotas in ivy league universities;
http://www.nytimes.com/roomforde ... -league-asian-quota

SCA5 issue in California.
http://80-20initiative.blogspot. ... ca5-first-then.html

2. job promotion.
Glass ceiling/Bamboo ceiling refers to the barriers faced by Asian-American professionals when trying to reach leadership roles in the  workplace.

3. The legal system.
Exemple: the case of vincent chin(陳果仁).


Look around more,
understand the issues in the society,
read between the lines of the news,
then you will see that
it is not quite as "fair and just" as we are led to believe.

If you choose not wanting to know,
choose to believe that everything is hunky dory,
well fine, continue to do so.
It is your life.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

14#
发表于 2014-9-21 16:28 | 只看该作者
拿着Fair和Just两块招牌, 就觉得自己KNOW了一切了, 你这样的家伙就是个笑话, 伪君子, 你只不过是在便于自己的时候拿着招牌出来挥舞一下, 不便的时候一个屁都不会放.
Optimism is mandatory.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

15#
发表于 2014-9-21 18:09 | 只看该作者
Post by mzmy;3434134
拿着Fair和Just两块招牌, 就觉得自己KNOW了一切了, 你这样的家伙就是个笑话, 伪君子, 你只不过是在便于自己的时候拿着招牌出来挥舞一下, 不便的时候一个屁都不会放.

This is a rational discussion of the illusion of "fair and just" American system.
I presented my facts, cases, links and view points about the American society.

Have you presented any facts and cases to counter my arguments?
So far, you have only presented diatribe(謾罵) without with logical points.

Are you capable of formulating r[color="blue"]ational, clear-headed, carefully-thought-out arguments?
Or perhaps spouting diatribe(謾罵) is the best that you can do.
Or perhaps your ability of reasoning is quite limited.

One more time, the arguments are listed below.

If one claims the American system is fair and just,
then how do you explain the various problems now and the past
that happen under such a system?
Just a few examples relevant to Chinese/Asian Americans.
ie.

  • Chinese/Asian quotas in ivy league universities;
  • the proposed SCA5 which is unfair to Asian Americans;
  • Glass ceiling/Bamboo ceiling refers to the barriers faced by Asian-American professionals when trying to reach leadership roles in the workplace;
  • the case of vincent chin(陳果仁).
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

16#
发表于 2014-9-21 20:26 | 只看该作者
理性讨论要看对手, 就你在这里做出的一系列Claims, 你用以印证自己Claim的例子, 以及这其中的推断逻辑, 我看不出任何和你讨论的必要. 至于我说你就是个笑话, 你自己的话, 就是足够我作出判断的Facts.
Optimism is mandatory.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

17#
发表于 2014-9-22 09:22 | 只看该作者
Post by mzmy;3434227
理性讨论要看对手, 就你在这里做出的一系列Claims, 你用以印证自己Claim的例子, 以及这其中的推断逻辑, 我看不出任何和你讨论的必要. 至于我说你就是个笑话, 你自己的话, 就是足够我作出判断的Facts.

Once again your response contains no fact, no logical reasoning,
just diatribe,
always evasive,
alway trying to avoid to deal directly with all the points that I made.

Your response proves my suspicion,
which is that
you are truly incapable to engage in a rational, logical discussion.

I rest my case.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

Copyright © 1999 - 2024 by Sinoquebec Media Inc. All Rights Reserved 未经许可不得摘抄  |  GMT-5, 2024-11-27 13:42 , Processed in 0.050569 second(s), 32 queries .