|
Charlie, xiexie,
I feel guilty for your both misunderstanding, sorry. In fact, I appreciate very much your first detailed and excellent description of the match (2 weeks ago from charlie and several weeks before from Xiexie), but obviously it took much time which is usually very expensive for you (and all of us). I saw that most of us might describe once (or few) the match in detail, but difficult to continue (only exception is Billding), specially for bad writer like me. Do we really need so detailed results? Yes we need if we have time and Billding here. But the essential thing is something showing that we had been together and passed a beautiful bridge meeting, then a simple result table is enough. Anybody could add commentary if having time and that'll be certainly welcome. So last saturday I recommended strongly to Charlie to simplify the report of the weekly result which shouldn't be missing. Extra description is nice but not really essential. We all know the fighting over bridge table is always very intense and tricky. Based on this, I found that the report for last saturday's result from Charlie and that for last sunday's result from Xiexie are both good enough (except words making misunderstanding). 5 minutes work, but complete! We might improve them, but it's a good initiation.
By the way, last's sunday's prolongation (8 hands) came from my proposition. Most of you guys could play friday night, I couldn't! |
|