In normal case, if anyone said he/she gets parent's VISA to USA IN MONTREAL recently, he/she is either a very lucky person (go go buy 649) or a cheater (but losing money to USA does no good for himself/herself, why do so?). , a5 @0 `3 N- ?+ o1 e4 o' E" G
1 n5 e. r" B6 }& t* jI mean in normal case. If the old man has a son or daughter in USA, or other relationships, that's another story.5 a, H! ~. s( Y( P4 i+ A; U1 z
# H5 b6 ?8 x9 y"where did u get that 100%?" good question. I think no answer but it's an experience earned with money.:frown:
Post by Robby & Nancy 0 W: f" Q0 m& r where did u get that 100%? :eek!:
; _) `/ |" R8 p! Q Y# \- ]$ \
The travel agents here. They have seen a lot of the cases and so far NO successful cases. I guess they have no reason to lie to me as this type of answer gives them less business and customers. Of course, I wish they were wrong. The argument here is about fact, not about position.
1)最近 1~2 年 in Montreal+ k! A# e; r$ _/ V
2)又说人家是骗子. exclude special cases (like xdjm in USA). ( L9 ^$ y4 _ n5 n: R. z/ fMany people were refused (a fact you have to admit), he/she got it. Can't you say he/she a lucky one? ( m3 s5 d% e% t% ` \+ q
He/She didn't get VISA but pretended to. Can't you say he/she a cheater? :mad: . q, y* ~5 k- S) k' }
- K6 U1 `* ]/ J# v. M3 D1 G$ e"你的说法太绝对了吧! 100%被拒是最近一周, 一个月, 一年..... 签证通过率怎么也比中649头奖高吧(难道你是指中5块钱), 又说人家是骗子, 没必要吧. " % ]! F* D, c( A& n7 l' m 7 f- r' ^ w9 V; D! ]3 B3) If 200 USD is nothing to you, just go there in Montreal. : T9 I `! z6 y; C* I/ K5 e( P. b4) I know there are the successful cases in Ottwa. I think it's better to go to Ontario.