LOL

谢谢你的解释。

我的创意只是给大家参考，一个点子而已。仁者见仁智者见。至于5颗五角星，这是代表中国。至于为什么设计成这个样子，就要问国旗的设计者了。

香水有毒

这个红心挺好，看到的人应该是联想到中国的国旗。世界上的禁忌很多，防不胜防。所以就干脆不要联想太多。

2dian

用WE代替I更合适.

rouyn1122

In the following link, there two short letters published in an international journal (Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment) in 2007 to refute one letter about Tibet written by an American professor. You could show these letters to your professor and classmates in your class and let them have a true story about Tibet...   


http://www.esa.org/esablog/blog_docs/Frontiers_letters_Tibet.pdf

Post by liliib
你可以参考一些文献，比如：
Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth by Dr. Michael Parenti. http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html
TIBET - A REALITY CHECK ：http://www.flonnet.com/fl1718/17180040.htm

LOL

感谢大家的意见。

关于用"Love"字母代替心型图案，我也试过，但是前者没有后者简单明了。

关于用"We"代替"I"，这里是西方国家，崇尚个人主义。我们在中国的教育都是用"我们"来统一代表人民的声音。我认为在这里，"I"就是"我"，千千万万个独立的"我"汇集在一起的声音会更加洪亮。

rouyn1122

In the following link, there two short letters published in an international journal (Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment) in 2007 to refute one letter about Tibet written by an American professor. You could show these letters to your professor and classmates in your class and let them have a true story about Tibet...


http://www.esa.org/esablog/blog_docs/Frontiers_letters_Tibet.pdf[/QUOTE]


Originally Posted by cahzwml
今天我的英语老师讲了dalai lama和甘地一样伟大, 主张非暴力革命, 还胡说中国在1949年侵入了Tibet.我现在才明白为什么有些西方人对中国有那么大的偏见, 又顽固. 他们从小接受这样的思想. 我和当地的青少年一起在一个COLLEGE学习. 我的老师是从McGill毕业的博士, 我有一次演讲的机会, 大家帮我提点建议, 怎么驳斥我的老师的观点, 谢谢.

starkid

不是星，是红色。以前TA的时候有个老外（华裔）说红色代表暴力。我就教育了她一番。

Post by LOL
五角星怎么会是暴力的象征?美国的国旗里面有一百颗五角星。英国，澳大利亚，新西兰这些西方国家的国旗里面都有五角星。五角星到底怎么和暴力相连，请大侠解释一下。

zyy_Jeanne

i ll go to! when?

rouyn1122

Please see this link, then you have more details:

http://www.sinoquebec.com/bbs/showt...threadid=526615

Post by zyy_Jeanne
i ll go to! when?

Taixi

WE DON`T GET THE BEST AND THE BRIGHTEST CHINESE IN QUEBEC BUT AT LEAST IN CHINA IT'S BETTER

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/24/world/asia/24china.html?ref=todayspaper

SHANGHAI — A group of prominent Chinese intellectuals has circulated a petition urging the government to stop what it calls a “one sided” propaganda campaign about Tibet and initiate direct dialogue with the Dalai Lama.

The petition, which was signed by more than two dozen writers, journalists and scholars, contains 12 recommendations. Taken together, they represent a sharp break from the government’s response to the wave of demonstrations that swept Tibetan areas of the country in recent weeks.




Most of the signers are Han Chinese, China’s dominant ethnic group. Their petition accused the government of “fanning racial hatred” in China by blaming ethnic Tibetans for the violence and seeking to inflame passions among the Han to support the crackdown.

One of the signers, Wang Lixiong, is a prolific writer and leading analyst of Tibetan issues. Others are better known for their liberal political views and their willingness to speak out against government policies.

The Chinese government has sought to convey a sense of strong domestic and international support for putting down what is depicted here as a civil disturbance by lawless people being instigated by the Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, whom Beijing denounces as a secessionist, or “splitist.” In recent days, the state-controlled media have also stepped up their criticisms of the international news media for what they say has been biased and overblown coverage of the Tibetan crisis. China has barred international journalists from Tibet and expelled most tourists and other foreigners from the region since the crisis began. As trouble has spread to neighboring provinces where many Tibetans live, the government has blocked access to these areas as well.

“In our view, the current news blockade cannot gain credit with the Chinese people or the international community, and is harmful to the credibility of the Chinese government,” the petitioners wrote. “Only by adopting an open attitude can we turn around the international community’s distrust of our government.”

Given the government’s stringent censorship of the media, including the Internet, it is not clear how widely knowledge of the petition will spread in China. But many of its points directly challenge or dispute the government line.

“We support the Dalai Lama’s appeal for peace, and hope that the ethnic conflict can be dealt with according to the principles of good will, peace and nonviolence,” it reads.

The petition cites accusations by the government that the unrest was “organized, premeditated and meticulously orchestrated by the Dalai clique,” and calls on Beijing to invite the United Nations Human Rights Council to do an independent investigation of these charges.

It states, “In order to prevent similar incidents from happening in the future, the government must abide by the freedom of religious belief and the freedom of speech explicitly enshrined in the Chinese Constitution, thereby allowing the Tibetan people to fully express their grievances and hopes and permitting citizens of all nationalities to freely criticize and make suggestions regarding the government’s nationality policies.”