Sweetheart_X

Don't worry 2M if some people agree that insulting each other is pointless. After all, it shouldn't be necessary.

Sniper+plus

Professor Sweetheart_X,

I bet you must be a jinni. What are you trying to prove here? To prove that you are the master of English? Then trying a GMAT might be a better course or still, you could talk through the night with your talented wife who must be all her eyes.

Good professors do not brag thier abilities of language - after all, it is a tool not a skill. I learnt my English on the street - so what? I communicate very well with all levels of people: on the streets, at workplace, in my wonderful dreams...

If you are still not satisfied with one loyal audience at home, then look for a bigger circle of partners. I am sure there are some Chinese females who will be more anxiously joining your club.

Some of them do not shave their underarms, be patient to teach them - in the same way you teach your  talented wife.

Off

Post by Sweetheart_X
There are individuals who decided to take it upon themselves to challenge my ability in English, and were interested to portray me as an individual who is interested in misleading. This is absolutely not the case. However, some people seem to be extremely closed-minded and judgmental...very quick to throw accusations of being misleading and dishonest. Is this the sign of educated individuals? Perhaps not.

Regarding your question "Do you say I am Canadian?": The answer is yes. Someone can say either "I am a Canadian" or "I am Canadian". Additionally, the fragment "If I can read the Chinese newspaper..." is also in and of itself grammatically correct. Therefore, given that you seem to have some kind of problem with these sentences, even though the English is correct, I suspect you have more a problem with me than with the syntax/grammar of my English. The balance of the errors that you seem to have issues with, as I said before, is typographical in nature. Some of the questions you asked me don't really make any sense, and therefore I cannot answer them. For example: "Who cares if you asked for a shopping idea?" Actually, I never made reference to shopping, stores, or buying anything. Please make it more clear what you are referring to. Perhaps you are trying to post something in another thread.

Furthermore, I also do not have an Anglophone wife, for if I did I would not be seeking to learn Mandarin, now would I? The term "Anglophone" refers to one who's native tongue is English, and since my wife's native tongue is Mandarin, she does not qualify as an Anglophone. I never claimed that my wife is perfectly fluent in English; however it is evident from her writings that her English is clearly better than yours. I suggest you continue to learn, and I would be more than happy to help you. Finally, in response to a question that is clearly none of your business ("why didn't you learn Mandarin from wife?"): several people (native Chinese) have agreed that for a foreigner to truly catch perfect Mandarin, two things should be followed:

1. The teacher should be from Beijing or Hubei or as close to Beijing as possible
2. The teacher should be of the same gender as the student, to facilitate the proper pronunciation

I would suggest that you demonstrate your level of education and in the future refrain from insulting people on topics that you have a weak knowledge of. Moreover, I also suggest that you demonstrate your true character by engaging in civilized conversation, rather than childish attacks.

Learning English is an important event, as is learning Mandarin. That is why I am seeking to exchange with high-quality Mandarin speakers. In exchange, I provide high quality English. No one ever suggested that you learn English from people who cannot write or are not well-educated.

I have come here to offer a simple exchange of language; there are those who are more interested in creating disturbances or challenging me. Therefore, in order to successfully defend against challenges to my English ability, a demonstration was required. Hopefully additional demonstrations will not be required and we can have more peaceful and civilized discussions.

chapulin

gggggggggggggggggggg

周梦

to 2M


据我所知, 有不少鬼佬也有和你一样的想法( 只是他们所谓的鬼妹与鬼佬的定义和你不一样). 正因为这世上有你们这样一群无赖, 才有令人不耻的种族歧视




[QUOTE][/QUOTE]你算哪头蒜啊？也不知道是个什么货色注册个新笔名来给鬼子献媚？我对鬼妹历来是利用她们的美妙身体，对鬼佬就是摧残他们可怜的自尊心。 如果哪个混蛋把这话翻译给这鬼佬，哼哼，走着瞧。

周梦

[QUOTE=周梦]to 2M


据我所知, 有不少鬼佬也有和你一样的想法( 只是他们所谓的鬼妹与鬼佬的定义和你不一样). 正因为这世上有你们这样一群无赖, 才有令人不耻的种族歧视

周梦

to 2M


据我所知, 有不少鬼佬也有和你一样的想法( 只是他们所谓的鬼妹与鬼佬的定义和你不一样). 正因为这世上有你们这样一群无赖, 才有令人不耻的种族歧视

周梦

据我所知, 有不少鬼佬也有和你一样的想法( 只是他们所谓的鬼妹与鬼佬的定义和你不一样). 正因为这世上有你们这样一群无赖, 才有令人不耻的种族歧视

Post by 2M
你算哪头蒜啊？也不知道是个什么货色注册个新笔名来给鬼子献媚？我对鬼妹历来是利用她们的美妙身体，对鬼佬就是摧残他们可怜的自尊心。 如果哪个混蛋把这话翻译给这鬼佬，哼哼，走着瞧。

cloudrain200

To Sweethear_X:
The following red-coloured letters are my correction of your logic. Don't behave like a kid, while parent criticizes you, you start to cry and lie down the floor.

Actually, you are interested in fighting with me, because if you followed a level of logic that is reflective of a higher education, you would notice that all of your new “arguments”, once again, have no basis (you think so, but these are facts) . You claim to list just the facts, but you list them in a manner (i would like you to understand, otherwise, you missed my points all the time) designed to attack (verify the meaning of attack in your dictionary, all the criticisms are attacks for you, right. Your replies were full of attacks, go back to check your judgement on my message). The sentence fragment “If I can read the Chinese newspaper…” is in and of itself grammatically correct(only a kid says one sentence). The article “the” denotes a specific Chinese newspaper(which one?): the newspaper that SQMedia was referring me to (SQ media mentioned Chinese newpaper, not specific newspaper, we have many kinds of Chinese newpapers). Therefore, since I am referring to a specific newspaper, the article “the” is required to illustrate that. I am sure that someone with your level of education can understand this logic. (we all understand but you)

While we are on the topic of logic, please refrain from challenging me in an area that is clearly not your area of expertise (if you were an expert of Logic and English language, You should cry shame on your self-boosting, i feel embarrassed for your educational system) : English or logic. Actually, your English is not too bad (you are not eligible to evaluate my English), and far better than my Mandarin (of which I know none)(You don't know how to compare, it is a problem of Logic). However, it is not nearly on the same level as mine. Thus, you should not be challenging my English (this is a free country. I can't challenge Prime Minister if i am not a P.M?), just as I would never challenge your Mandarin. Logically, when one has demonstrated superiority in a certain area (i didn't come to discuss your English grammar, i told u before, i posted message here for i didn't like the way you had treated my Chinese fellows, go to check my post), the person interested to learn should defer. Hopefully, even through fighting with me you will learn (?), .

P.S. That is great that you claim to have a publication in the British Journal of Pharmacology (1997)! (1997, 121, 1141-1149, Renal effects of intrathecally injected tachykinins in the conscious saline-loaded  rat: receptor and mechanism of action) Unfortunately, I was unable to find any publication (go to check the above-mentioned article, i was the first author) under the name of cloudrain2000(a net user name is better than a femine name used by a male, sick). If you would like, you can refer to The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2005), under the title “Hemodilution and surgical hemostasis contribute significantly to transfusion requirements in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass”. You already have my name. Alternatively, I can provide you with a .pdf copy if you like.

You say that you do not like the way your Chinese fellows were treated by me. I did not treat them badly. If you follow the logic and the flow of conversation, who was the one who attacked who first?(nobody attacked, people were just suspicious, who is narrow-minded?) Who created the problem (you or your talented wife )and who was on the defensive?(you like to argue) In terms of correcting the English, if people are interested to question my ability, and are so quick to judge from a typographical error(still doesn't amit, sad), then obviously they require a clear and solid demonstration (use your logic, guys were just quesioning your first post, which it was obviously written by wife, anything wrong, plus your wife or you were so rude when SQmedia kindly suggested Chinese newpaper) . You seem to require multiple demonstrations; thus, it appears as if you are just not interested in having peaceful conversations(any critisms were demonstration for you, you are a dictator). Furthermore, someone with your level of education (i have a M.D and M.Sc, it is higher than 99.9 % of Canadians) and “logical ability” would have noticed that I did indeed inform everyone that my wife posted the message. Furthermore, I never wrote that Hubei was a typographical error ( you never admit any errors); instead, I wrote that I was unsure how to spell it (ASK YOUR WIFE) because I am not familiar enough with China. Everyone else seems to understand this, why don’t you? You should carefully re-read my posts. That is why you are the only one who continues to question, because unfortunately you are the only one who did not understand(YES, i don't understand your logic and mental facility) That is alright, I can take this opportunity to explain it to you. As one educated individual to another, I would offer a piece of advice on logic: in order to be truly logical, one must carefully examine all of the facts and evidence before rushing to judgment (this is not theory of Logic, go to ask your high school teacher). One who rushes to judgment out of emotion and partial information is not logical(yourself), for emotions are in and of themselves not always rational processes, and using only part of the available information creates an imbalanced view (any view in favor of you is balanced, weird).

It is really a shame that some people do not wish to create a warm and open atmosphere for the fun exchange of language ( because you and your wife are too confusing). So what if some small error in writing was committed in the earlier messages? Subsequent messages have obviously cleared up that misunderstanding!(it is true, but you were aggressive then) You claim that “in the future you are not interested to reply to my posts”,(i don't like to waste time) but this is typically the logic of a child who is angry (you always judge on somebody, why was i angry?)that he or she did not get what she wanted (i wanted nothing. in fact, you didn't get what you wanted) and then decides to throw a temper tantrum(you just past this age, you know how to manipulate with this technique). Please, control your emotions and let us discuss things together as adults, in a civilized and peaceful manner! We are all mature here. I welcome any stories you may have about the differences and similarities between Canada and China (your logic and attitude are differences between us. plsease go to check my last post, what advices i gave to you, what questions you didn't answner. I will wait for you, otherwise, you will throw your "temper tantrum")

I don't have time to correct your logic in your first reply to my first post. You mentioned anglophone wife, etc., Is it your "logic ability"? I don't like you to pay me  this Logic lesson, it is just a gift for some cheap Canadians. You can go to McGill to register a Chinese course, then you have no so many corrections of your English, logic and Chinese (i don't think you can learn), demonstrations, and attacks. Good luck in your seaching your Chinese teacher!  

cloudrain200

To Sweethear_X:
The following red-coloured letters are my correction of your logic. Don't behave like a kid, while parent criticizes you, you start to cry and lie down the floor.

Actually, you are interested in fighting with me, because if you followed a level of logic that is reflective of a higher education, you would notice that all of your new “arguments”, once again, have no basis (you think so, but these are facts) . You claim to list just the facts, but you list them in a manner (i would like you to understand, otherwise, you missed my points all the time) designed to attack (verify the meaning of attack in your dictionary, all the criticisms are attacks for you, right. Your replies were full of attacks, go back to check your judgement on my message). The sentence fragment “If I can read the Chinese newspaper…” is in and of itself grammatically correct(only a kid says one sentence). The article “the” denotes a specific Chinese newspaper(which one?): the newspaper that SQMedia was referring me to (SQ media mentioned Chinese newpaper, not specific newspaper, we have many kinds of Chinese newpapers). Therefore, since I am referring to a specific newspaper, the article “the” is required to illustrate that. I am sure that someone with your level of education can understand this logic. (we all understand but you)

While we are on the topic of logic, please refrain from challenging me in an area that is clearly not your area of expertise (if you were an expert of Logic and English language, You should cry shame on your self-boosting, i feel embarrassed for your educational system) : English or logic. Actually, your English is not too bad (you are not eligible to evaluate my English), and far better than my Mandarin (of which I know none)(You don't know how to compare, it is a problem of Logic). However, it is not nearly on the same level as mine. Thus, you should not be challenging my English (this is a free country. I can't challenge Prime Minister if i am not a P.M?), just as I would never challenge your Mandarin. Logically, when one has demonstrated superiority in a certain area (i didn't come to discuss your English grammar, i told u before, i posted message here for i didn't like the way you had treated my Chinese fellows, go to check my post), the person interested to learn should defer. Hopefully, even through fighting with me you will learn (?), .

P.S. That is great that you claim to have a publication in the British Journal of Pharmacology (1997)! (1997, 121, 1141-1149, Renal effects of intrathecally injected tachykinins in the conscious saline-loaded  rat: receptor and mechanism of action) Unfortunately, I was unable to find any publication (go to check the above-mentioned article, i was the first author) under the name of cloudrain2000(a net user name is better than a femine name used by a male, sick). If you would like, you can refer to The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2005), under the title “Hemodilution and surgical hemostasis contribute significantly to transfusion requirements in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass”. You already have my name. Alternatively, I can provide you with a .pdf copy if you like.

You say that you do not like the way your Chinese fellows were treated by me. I did not treat them badly. If you follow the logic and the flow of conversation, who was the one who attacked who first?(nobody attacked, people were just suspicious, who is narrow-minded?) Who created the problem (you or your talented wife )and who was on the defensive?(you like to argue) In terms of correcting the English, if people are interested to question my ability, and are so quick to judge from a typographical error(still doesn't amit, sad), then obviously they require a clear and solid demonstration (use your logic, guys were just quesioning your first post, which it was obviously written by wife, anything wrong, plus your wife or you were so rude when SQmedia kindly suggested Chinese newpaper) . You seem to require multiple demonstrations; thus, it appears as if you are just not interested in having peaceful conversations(any critisms were demonstration for you, you are a dictator). Furthermore, someone with your level of education (i have a M.D and M.Sc, it is higher than 99.9 % of Canadians) and “logical ability” would have noticed that I did indeed inform everyone that my wife posted the message. Furthermore, I never wrote that Hubei was a typographical error ( you never admit any errors); instead, I wrote that I was unsure how to spell it (ASK YOUR WIFE) because I am not familiar enough with China. Everyone else seems to understand this, why don’t you? You should carefully re-read my posts. That is why you are the only one who continues to question, because unfortunately you are the only one who did not understand(YES, i don't understand your logic and mental facility) That is alright, I can take this opportunity to explain it to you. As one educated individual to another, I would offer a piece of advice on logic: in order to be truly logical, one must carefully examine all of the facts and evidence before rushing to judgment (this is not theory of Logic, go to ask your high school teacher). One who rushes to judgment out of emotion and partial information is not logical(yourself), for emotions are in and of themselves not always rational processes, and using only part of the available information creates an imbalanced view (any view in favor of you is balanced, weird).

It is really a shame that some people do not wish to create a warm and open atmosphere for the fun exchange of language ( because you and your wife are too confusing). So what if some small error in writing was committed in the earlier messages? Subsequent messages have obviously cleared up that misunderstanding!(it is true, but you were aggressive then) You claim that “in the future you are not interested to reply to my posts”,(i don't like to waste time) but this is typically the logic of a child who is angry (you always judge on somebody, why was i angry?)that he or she did not get what she wanted (i wanted nothing. in fact, you didn't get what you wanted) and then decides to throw a temper tantrum(you just past this age, you know how to manipulate with this technique). Please, control your emotions and let us discuss things together as adults, in a civilized and peaceful manner! We are all mature here. I welcome any stories you may have about the differences and similarities between Canada and China (your logic and attitude are differences between us. plsease go to check my last post, what advices i gave to you, what questions you didn't answner. I will wait for you, otherwise, you will throw your "temper tantrum")

I don't have time to correct your logic in your first reply to my first post. You mentioned anglophone wife, etc., Is it your "logic ability"? I don't like you to pay me  this Logic lesson, it is just a gift for some cheap Canadians. You can go to McGill to register a Chinese course, then you have no so many corrections of your English, logic and Chinese (i don't think you can learn), demonstrations, and attacks. Good luck in your seaching your Chinese teacher!  

Sweetheart_X

Hey 2M, guess what? You made some more errors in your English reply this time! Let us start with this one: (“I haven't written any error such as " if you are interesting...." since my junior high school”. Actually, you just made several errors in the aforementioned sentence.

1. “I haven’t written any error such as”… because you are referring to a specific type of error, the correct way to write it is “I haven’t written an error such as”. “Any” should be replaced by “an”.

2. “…since my junior high school”. You are referring to the time you were in junior high school, thus you should write: …since my days in junior high school.

3. The overall sentence would sound something like this: I haven’t written an error such as “if you are interesting…” since my days in junior high school.

Amazing! In one sentence you created two errors, and yet you criticize other people for only making one error in one sentence. Practice your logic before creating an argument…

“Ｉ　ａｄｍｉｔ　ｂｕｔ　Ｉ　have　ｎｏ　ｍｏｒｅ　ｉｎｔｅｒｅｓｔ　in doing so since my English is good enough to serve my life”. Truly educated people are always seeking to improve their knowledge, because the more you know the more questions you will have. Those who elect to remain stagnated can never progress further. Everyone has the ability to continuously learn, and the decision not to learn reflects laziness and only a dim level of awareness.

“You try to distance us by prasing some and devaluing others? What a naive trick?” Actually, I do no try to create distance between anyone. However, the level of the suggestions that your friend offered is clearly out of your league. I was simultaneously complimenting him or her on the effort and pointing out that it is quite sad that you were pretending that these suggestions were your own. Did you get through school by pretending other people’s work was your own as well?

Regarding the GMAT scores, I think that it is great that Chinese are ranked number one! It’s not a shame at all to native English speakers. Because I am Canadian, one of my values is that I embrace multiculturalism, and I do not follow any forms of racial discrimination. I think that whoever works the hardest should be rewarded the highest scores. High scores are not necessarily a reflection of ability, but rather a reflection of the work ethic that Chinese are extremely famous for. I say congratulations to the Chinese for reaching the top spot on the GMAT! However, I am not sure I can offer you as an individual this same congratulation. I suggest you take the time to continue to improve, you could use it.