后悔了

谢谢提供帮助的同胞，也谢谢骂我的同胞，这是我一辈子的教训。


根据大家提供的信息，我会尝试找法律援助。我期望能得到法官的宽恕不想为此毁了我的前程。

但是，我不得不做最坏的打算，法官给我bad record 的记录。我不知道这会对我将来找工作，租房之类造成多大的影响。有没有朋友知道？

自从出事后，我很恐慌，心里空荡荡的，脑子发晕，都不知道在干啥子了。我不知道该不该给家人讲，我很惭愧，羞于启口。所以我现在多寄希望与网友，也许我真的应该告之家人吧。

除了谢谢，除了对不起，我不知道该说什么了。

FUJJJ

这是刑事案，法官虽然说法语，但大多数法官的母语是法语，听起来较顺。这样对你案子有利。

niannian

人人都会犯错，以后不再犯就好，也不要太大的压力给自己，免得精神出现问题。
DEPANEUR 里偷东西的老外太多了，报完了案，警察也懒得管。

毛血旺

-------------------------------无语

qingyunliu

不要有下次,人总会有错
打点零工,什么都有了,何必呢

presse7

没啥大不了的，放宽心。你的条件应该能申请到法律援助。先去申请法律援助。我估计最多就是个PEACE BOND，对你没什么影响。

法律援助的律师有的很差劲，没有任何职业操守，会一个劲地劝你认罪，那样你麻烦就大了。遇到这样的律师，坚决换掉。、

总之，你的底线最多就是PEACE BOND. 千万别认罪。这里的铁律就是不认罪，别的什么坦白，宽恕都是扯淡。你可以找种种的借口：压力大，神情恍惚忘了付钱。记性不好，等等等。总之，自己不是有意要去拿（偷）商店的东西。

别听论坛里的个别人吓唬，他们不懂。5000以下的盗窃，想判你个刑事犯罪不是那么容易的。

另外，以后见了律师，包括以后的任何人，别这么实在。就说你是被误解了，被冤枉了，你根本就没想去偷商店的东西。

希望能帮到你，并希望你把事件的进展及时通知我们。如果需要进一步咨询可以给我PM。把心放肚子里吧，不是什么大事。坏事变好事，让你迅速熟悉游戏规则。

peterpan1668

再仔细了解一下我的帖子，你的年龄段是多少？如果属于年轻群体，就容易解决的多了：
【探讨】顺手牵羊和偶尔失足

Post by 后悔了;3097928
真的会有不良记录吗？我是第一次，是初犯，法官会给我机会吗？
还有请问，我没钱请律师，法庭是当天上庭时给我指定一位免费律师吗？
再次为自己的行为忏悔。

iop

Post by presse7;3098459
没啥大不了的，放宽心。你的条件应该能申请到法律援助。先去申请法律援助。我估计最多就是个PEACE BOND，对你没什么影响。

法律援助的律师有的很差劲，没有任何职业操守，会一个劲地劝你认罪，那样你麻烦就大了。遇到这样的律师，坚决换掉。、

总之，你的底线最多就是PEACE BOND. 千万别认罪。这里的铁律就是不认罪，别的什么坦白，宽恕都是扯淡。你可以找种种的借口：压力大，神情恍惚忘了付钱。记性不好，等等等。总之，自己不是有意要去拿（偷）商店的东西。

别听论坛里的个别人吓唬，他们不懂。5000以下的盗窃，想判你个刑事犯罪不是那么容易的。

另外，以后见了律师，包括以后的任何人，别这么实在。就说你是被误解了，被冤枉了，你根本就没想去偷商店的东西。

希望能帮到你，并希望你把事件的进展及时通知我们。如果需要进一步咨询可以给我PM。把心放肚子里吧，不是什么大事。坏事变好事，让你迅速熟悉游戏规则。

(1) 查了一下关于 PEACE BOND 的定义. 是加拿大刑事法庭发出的 Order.

连接:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_bond_(Canada)



(2) 这里有个关于 $5000以上, 和$5000以下的可能判决的说明:

http://www.normstanford.com/charges-defended/theft/

$5000以下最坏的情况是2年. 看你的情况是$50,  1%而已, 又是first time, 没有那么严重. 建议争取罚款判决.



(3) 这是一些同样Case的讨论:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090812180247AACpYF9

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110615223759AA2F3Zp



(4) 在加拿大的刑法中, 关于偷窃的处罚:
Canada
Section 322(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada provides the general definition for theft in Canada:
322. (1) Every one commits theft who fraudulently and without colour of right takes, or fraudulently and without colour of right converts to his use or to the use of another person, anything, whether animate or inanimate, with intent
(a) to deprive, temporarily or absolutely, the owner of it, or a person who has a special property or interest in it, of the thing or of his property or interest in it;
(b) to pledge it or deposit it as security;
(c) to part with it under a condition with respect to its return that the person who parts with it may be unable to perform; or
(d) to deal with it in such a manner that it cannot be restored in the condition in which it was at the time it was taken or converted.[3]
Sections 323 to 333 provide for more specific instances and exclusions:
theft from oyster beds (s. 323)
theft by bailee of things under seizure (s. 324)
exception when agent is pledging goods (s. 325)
theft of telecommunications service (s. 326)
possession of device to obtain telecommunication facility or service (s. 327)
theft by or from person having special property or interest (s. 328)
theft by person required to account (s. 330)
theft by person holding power of attorney (s. 331)
misappropriation of money held under direction (s. 332)
exception for ore taken for exploration or scientific research (s. 333)
In the general definition above, the Supreme Court of Canada has construed "anything" very broadly, stating that it is not restricted to tangibles, but includes intangibles. To be the subject of theft it must, however:
be property of some sort;
be property capable of being
taken (therefore intangibles are excluded); or
converted (and may be an intangible);
taken or converted in a way that deprives the owner of his proprietary interest in some way.[4]
Because of this, confidential information cannot be the subject of theft, as it is not capable of being taken as only tangibles can be taken. It cannot be converted, not because it is an intangible, but because, save in very exceptional far‑fetched circumstances, the owner would never be deprived of it.[4]
For the purposes of punishment, Section 334 divides theft into two separate offences, according to the value and nature of the goods stolen:
If the thing stolen is worth more than $5000 or is a testamentary instrument the offence is commonly referred to as [color="red"][color="navy"]Theft Over $5000 and is an indictable offence with a maximum punishment of 10 years imprisonment.
Where the stolen item is not a testamentary instrument and is not worth more than $5000 it is known as [color="red"][color="navy"]Theft Under $5000 and is a hybrid offence, meaning that it can be treated either as an indictable offence or a less serious summary conviction offence, depending on the choice of the prosecutor.
if dealt with as an indictable offence, it is punishable by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, and,
if treated as a summary conviction offence, it is punishable by 6 months imprisonment, a fine of $2000 or both.
Where a motor vehicle is stolen, Section 333.1 provides for a maximum punishment of 10 years for an indictable offence (and a minimum sentence of six months for a third or subsequent conviction), and a maximum sentence of 18 months on summary conviction.



(5) 也许网友 presse7 的建议, 可以考虑.


希望这些对楼主有帮助. 做最坏打算, 做最好的争取.

后悔了

谢谢大家。
我已经36，7岁了，应该不能考虑为青少年一类。

当时来的警察说根据他的经验，只要我在法官面前好好讲清楚并请求宽恕，有可能判罚款。

但是根据你们的意见，又不支持认罪，我该怎么办？

文星火

这个人好，善良，认错态度好，应该帮！！！